Search for: All records

Any graph drawing can be characterised by a range of computational aesthetic metrics. For example, a given drawing might be described as having eight crossings, a mean angular resolution of 0.34, and an edge orthogonality value of 0.72. However, without knowing the distribution of these metrics it is hard to compare the quality of drawings of different graphs, nor know whether a given drawing is typical or an outlier within the space of all possible drawings. This paper explores the range and distribution of ten normalised graph drawing layout metrics, based on graphs created by six graph generation algorithms and drawings created by six popular layout algorithms. We include the “Rome" and “North" graph repositories in our analysis. Our exploration of the multi-dimensional aesthetics space allows for comparisons between the graph drawing algorithms, highlighting those that cover larger or smaller volumes of the aesthetics space. We calculate the correlation coefficients between the metrics, indicating those that may conflict with each other (negatively correlated), and those that may be redundant (positively correlated). Our results will be useful as the basis for simulated annealing or gradient descent layout algorithms, for identifying the best layout algorithms for producing a specified combination and range of aesthetics, and for informing experimental controls in human empirical studies.